Report on disputed scientific claims within AcaWiki

This table lists works in AcaWiki that dispute the methods, data, findings, or conclusions of other works:

Subsequent work	Disputes	Subject
Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff	Growth in a time of debt	Economics
Efficient lysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes	A diffusible lymphokine produced by CD8+ T lymphocytes	Medicine
RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children	Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children	Medicine
Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by CD8+ cells: evidence for HLA class I-restricted triggering of cytolytic and noncytolytic mechanisms	A diffusible lymphokine produced by CD8+ T lymphocytes	Medicine
The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment	The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime	Economics

How to record scientific disputes for this table

To add another work to this table, imitate existing uses of Template:Disputes reference, thus: On a page about a work that refutes or disputes another work, add this line of code like this after the summary, replacing the title after "source=" by the wikilink to the work with a disputed method or finding:

{{Disputes reference | source=A diffusible lymphokine produced by CD8+ T lymphocytes‎}}

That will display on the page as:

"This work disputes the methods, data, or findings of source A diffusible lymphokine produced by CD8+ T lymphocytes‎."

And it will use relevant categories and Property:Disputes to get it into this report. BUT it takes a couple of days, because of some periodic database process that has to run to pick it up. The sense of reward is delayed.

Feedback welcome. --- Pbmeyer (talk) 16:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC)