STOP SOPA ☣ STOP RWA
Two bills are making their way through the U.S. Congress that would have highly negative consequences for AcaWiki and the public good. Please take action against both.
Many large sites are blacked out January 18 to spur action against SOPA. Visit americancensorship.org to take action against this bill, which is a censorship and security risk for the entire internet. Wikimedia's General Counsel explains how SOPA would hurt wikis.
RWA would prohibit federal agencies from conditioning their grants to require that articles reporting on publicly funded research be made accessible to the public online. This is unjust and would specifically harm AcaWiki by greatly reducing the number of people with access to important literature — access is required to summarize. Please tell congresspeople to oppose RWA.
See AcaWiki:SOPA-RWA for planning and discussion of this message.
The Preference for Indirect Harm
From AcaWiki
Citation: Edward B. Royzman, Jonathan Baron (2002) The Preference for Indirect Harm. Social Justice Research (RSS)
Download: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.7.9741&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Tagged: Psychology (RSS)
Summary:
This research finds a bias in favor of indirect harm. The researchers test a number of different scenarios and consistently find that people prefer the indirect option. For example people think it's worse to move someone in your way to avoid a bullet, versus jumping out of the way and the person behind you gets shot. They test whether the indirectness bias is a manifestation of the omission bias. Utilitarian philosophers would find the moral and legal relevance of indirectness irrelevant because they are only concerned with expected consequences. Milgram suggests the division of labor exists so things can be done indirectly and therefore it's easier to harm. Our greater moral tolerance towards the infliction of indirect harm can be utilized in service of mass evil.
