Nepotistic relationships in Twitter and their impact on rank prestige algorithms

From AcaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Citation: Daniel Gayo-Avello (2010) Nepotistic relationships in Twitter and their impact on rank prestige algorithms. arxiv (RSS)


Download: http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.0816

Tagged: Computer Science (RSS) spam (RSS), expert-finding (RSS), Twitter (RSS), spam-detection (RSS), influence metrics (RSS)


Summary:

Compared 5 "prestige algorithms": PageRank, HITS, NodeRanking, TunkRank, TwitterRank on a large dataset: 28 million English tweets from 5 million users. TunkRank (description) (implementation) (API) (slides about), which discounts reciprocal follows, is best.

Theoretical and practical relevance:

Spam is an ongoing problem in social networks. Evaluating algorithms for filtering it is useful! Presented at CERI2010 as "Overcoming Spammers in Twitter" http://slidesha.re/a2RKs8 This is a paper with both extensive related work/perspective on the literature and significant quantitative analysis -- a rare combination! Methodology for identifying abusive users in Twitter may be useful elsewhere.

This was published in an open access journal.


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
New
Tools
Discussion
Help
Toolbox