You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: emailconfirmed.
Required fields in red. If you can furnish further bibliographic information please do so. You can find this information directly on the paper or searching for a record on Google Scholar.
Summary: Please include an objective summary of the main findings from the paper here. You may want to include a high-level summary of the theoretical background, methods, and results.
Simmel's classic article on [[The triad]] can be seen as the seminal article on networks and brokerage and, probably most correctly, as largely before its time in its treatment.
Simmel uses the article as a means of offering an ontology of different types of three-person relationships or, describing the sociological significant of the third actor.
The first type is the ''non-partisan'' or the ''mediator''. The example Simmel gives is a child in a marriage who has the function of holding the marriage together. This can happen either by strengthening a relationship between two or by creating a new indirect relationship between two people. Non-partisan can either stand equally between two positions or can stand "above" them in some sense.
The ''tertius gaudens'' is perhaps the most influential piece of the short article and describest the "third who benefits." The idea of the tertius gaudens is that it is a person who keeps people apart and who, as the gateway between the two, can extract rents. Either, the tertius can encourage the other two to compete for their favor. As the broker, the tertius can play the two sides off each other. Simmel describes the extreme form of the tertius as the buying public on a market and argues taht the advantage acruing to the tertius derives from the face that, "he has an equal, and equally independent, and for this very reason, decisive, relation to the two others."
The final major type is ''divide et impera'' (divide and rule) which is someone who creates conflict in order to gain a dominating position. This might be done through distribution of assets in such a way that creates jealousy and fighting. The most active form would actually attempt to unleash a fight between two groups.
Theoretical and practical relevance: You may want to write about the implications of this research for theory and/or the real world. You may also want to link to any news stories or blog posts about the article here.
Simmel's short piece can be seen as the basis of much of the social network literature and, in particular, the literature on brokerage and structural holes in particule.
An in-depth summary can be found at:
Please note that all contributions to AcaWiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (see AcaWiki:Copyrights for details).
If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
This is a minor edit
Watch this page
Please do not post copyrighted material; you can read our Posting Guidelines. If you need help adding your summaries feel free to contact us. You may also import BibTeX.