Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of design space analysis

From AcaWiki

Jump to: navigation, search


Citation: Allan MacLean, Richard M. Young, Victoria M.E. Bellotti, Thomas P. Moran (1991) Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction (RSS)



Tagged: argumentation (RSS), design space analysis (RSS), HCI (RSS), design rationale (RSS), QOC (RSS)


Summary:

QOC - Questions, Options, and Criteria - originated as a semiformal notation for a design rationale, intended to make it easier to discuss the tradeoffs made in choosing a design.

The Q, O, and C, of the title indicate the three most basic concepts of Design Space Analysis:

A fourth concept is also needed:

A QOC diagram indicates short descriptions (preceded by Q: O: or C:).Assessments are shown as solid (positive) or dashed (negative) lines between an Option and a Criterion.

QOC-representation.png (A full discussion of this appears in section 2.1.)

Related work is IBIS, gIBIS, Procedural Hierarchy of Issues (1986), and the Decision Representation Language (Lee & Lai 1991). The authors distinguish QOC by IBIS in that QOC is specific to design rationale. They also "see a QOC representation as a condensation of an IBIS-encoded history that brings out the most important elements of the history for logical argumentation." Thus, a discussion in IBIS could be further processed, under this methodology, to identify areas that need further examination.

Specifically:

The paper also gives a case study with QOC diagrams based on a user study, and discusses the criteria of QOC, for instance that it is a coproduct of the design process.




Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
New
Tools
Discussion
Help
Toolbox