STOP SOPA ☣ STOP RWA
Two bills are making their way through the U.S. Congress that would have highly negative consequences for AcaWiki and the public good. Please take action against both.
Many large sites are blacked out January 18 to spur action against SOPA. Visit americancensorship.org to take action against this bill, which is a censorship and security risk for the entire internet. Wikimedia's General Counsel explains how SOPA would hurt wikis.
RWA would prohibit federal agencies from conditioning their grants to require that articles reporting on publicly funded research be made accessible to the public online. This is unjust and would specifically harm AcaWiki by greatly reducing the number of people with access to important literature — access is required to summarize. Please tell congresspeople to oppose RWA.
See AcaWiki:SOPA-RWA for planning and discussion of this message.
Expressing argumentative discussions in social media sites
From AcaWiki
Citation: Christoph Lange, Uldis Bojārs, Tudor Groza, John G. Breslin, Siegfried Handschuh (2008) Expressing argumentative discussions in social media sites. Social Data on the Web (RSS)
Download: http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-405/paper4.pdf
Tagged: Computer Science (RSS) Semantic Web (RSS), online argumentation (RSS), social media websites (RSS), SIOC (RSS), decision making (RSS), IBIS (RSS)
Summary:
Motivation
Online discussions contain hidden semantics which machines can't easily parse, including argumentation.
Ontologies like SIOC (Semantically Interlinked Online Communities, see e.g. Interlinking the social Web with semantics) can help indicate the flow of participants and the underlying structure.
Forums and blog discussions, wiki discussions and bug tracking are presented as places argumentative discussions happen; these use cases motivate the need for an argumentation model for SIOC. In wikis, structured argumentation already happens using the DILIGENT ontology, on http://wiki.openmath.org/
Model
An IBIS-based argumentation model for SIOC is presented (Fig 3), however using it presents several issues: "Once the software supports the SIOC argumentation in principle, the next challenge is acquiring information about argumentative structures in discussions. This could be done automatically, or by letting the users annotate their posts manually."
Use Cases
- An opinion in a blog posts could be responded to with comments that agree or disagree.
- Determining the location of a meeting for a discussion thread on a forum or bulletin board.
- Wiki discussions
- Bug tracking
See also
This paper is updated by An Abstract Framework for Modeling Argumentation in Virtual Communities, which presents a related argumentation model, while addressing the granularity concerns raised in this article. It also references work on SWiM (Arguing on issues with mathematical knowledge items in a semantic wiki) and DILIGENT(An Argumentation Ontology for Distributed, Loosely-controlled and evolvInG Engineering processes of oNTologies (DILIGENT))
Related Work
The related work section is quite useful, referencing related theories, models, and applications.
Selected References
- U. Bojārs, J. G. Breslin, V. Peristeras, G. Tummarello, and S. Decker. Interlinking the social Web with semantics. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(3), May/June 2008.
- C. Lange, T. Hastrup, and S. Corlosquet. Arguing on issues with mathematical knowledge items in a semantic wiki. In J. Baumeister and M. Atzmüller, editors, LWA, 2008.
- C. Tempich, H. S. Pinto, Y. Sure, and S. Staab. An Argumentation Ontology for Distributed, Loosely-controlled and evolvInG Engineering processes of oNTologies (DILIGENT). In ESWC 2005, pages 241–256, 2005.
Theoretical and practical relevance:
Users will be able to get machines to do some for the work for them!
